Home > Middle East > Article

M: The Symbol of Ambiguity That Hides the Story of Conflict in the Middle East

Middle East ✍️ أحمد السبيعي 🕒 2026-03-20 16:36 🔥 Views: 1
صورة تعبيرية لمشهد عسكري في منطقة الشرق الأوسط

Every time you try to map out the scene in our Arab region, you find the letter "M" recurring with weight. Minecraft, accountability, Gmail, Mirasol, Egypt.. These words seem disconnected, but at their core, they form a mosaic of the current crisis. On March 20th, the scene isn't just a collection of passing headlines; it's the culmination of years of debate over the concept of the state and its arms. From Khartoum to Tripoli, the common thread is the same: who holds the decision-making power? And who pays the price?

Al-Burhan and the Imperative of Arms Monopoly: Between Principle and Reality

Days ago, the commander of the Sudanese army, General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, was crystal clear when he stressed that there should be no weapons outside the state's framework. This isn't new in political rhetoric, but this time it comes at a very critical juncture. Everyone knows that the Sudanese 'Minecraft' – if you will – has become complex, with the threads of militias intertwined with state institutions. What's happening in Sudan now is a real test for this vision. The army there faces the challenge of international sanctions behind the scenes, but the Sudanese insistence on this point brings us back to a fundamental question: can any peace plan succeed without the state having the final say in matters of war and peace?

Libya.. The Recurring 'Mirasol' Story

On the other side of the border, in Libya, the same story plays out in a different guise. The name 'Mirasol' has resurfaced these days, not just as an oil company, but as a symbol of the struggle over resources that fuels chaos. When we talk about true accountability, it starts here. How can there be accountability for bloodshed and wealth if weapons are held by those who are not answerable to anyone? I've been following this file for years, and I can say with confidence: the continued existence of multiple armed factions is the one thing that guarantees the persistence of corruption and the plundering of the people's resources. What's being whispered behind the scenes these days isn't new; it's a continuation of the influence struggle among regional and international players exploiting this vacuum.

  • The Sudanese Scene: An open battle between the army and the Rapid Support Forces, with international pressures calling for a ceasefire, but the bigger question remains about the fate of heavy weaponry after the war.
  • The Libyan Scene: A political division reflecting a military division, where internal and external parties tug at the reconciliation file, all while the ordinary citizen remains the biggest loser.
  • Egypt and the Weight of Stability: Cairo is moving cautiously, knowing full well that any collapse among its neighbours means the fire will reach its own home. Egypt's role today is pivotal in trying to bring the parties together, but it remains contingent on these parties' seriousness in giving up their own 'Minecraft'.

When 'Minecraft' Becomes a Bitter Reality

Anyone following the details finds that the term 'Minecraft' is no longer just a video game; it has become an apt description of the state of affairs in the neighbouring countries. Each side tries to build its own world according to its own rules, forgetting that when these virtual worlds collide with reality, they turn into human catastrophes. The tragedy is that some regional players still treat these files like a chess game, forgetting that the pieces here aren't inanimate; they are blood and souls. Every time I read a message from one of the officials handling these files, I sense they recognise the danger, yet they hesitate to take the decisive step that would end this suffering.

The unavoidable conclusion, agreed upon even by those who differ on details, is that resolving the region's crises begins with ending the state of multiple military loyalties. What is happening in Sudan and Libya is a harsh lesson for anyone who thinks stability can be built on shifting sands. Talk of elections, development, and the return of migrants – all these are dreams that will not come true unless the state is the sole entity with the right to use force. We are at a defining crossroads: either the idea of a unifying nation-state prevails, or we descend into an endless spiral of chaos that only serves those who want this region to remain weak and torn apart.