Home > Middle East > Article

M: The Enigma Shrouding the Middle East's Story of Conflict

Middle East ✍️ أحمد السبيعي 🕒 2026-03-20 21:36 🔥 Views: 1
صورة تعبيرية لمشهد عسكري في منطقة الشرق الأوسط

Whenever you try to map out the scene in our Arab world, you find the letter "M" cropping up with significant weight. Minecraft, accountability, Gmail, Mirasol, Egypt... words that seem disparate, but at their core form the mosaic of the current crisis. On March 20th, the picture isn't just a series of fleeting headlines; it's the culmination of years of debate over the concept of the state and its monopoly on arms. From Khartoum to Tripoli, one common thread runs through: who holds the reins of power? And who pays the price?

Burhan and the Imperative of Centralising Arms: Between Principle and Reality

Just days ago, the Sudanese army commander, General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, was crystal clear when he stressed that there should be no arms outside the state's framework. This isn't a new talking point, but its timing this time is incredibly precise. Everyone knows that the Sudanese 'Minecraft' – for lack of a better term – has become incredibly complex, with the threads of militias intertwined with state institutions. What's happening in Sudan now is a real test for this vision. The army there is quietly grappling with international sanctions, but Sudan's insistence on this point brings us back to a fundamental question: can any peace plan succeed without the state holding the ultimate authority over war and peace?

Libya.. The Recurring 'Mirasol' Story

On the other side of the border, in Libya, the same story plays out in a different form. The name 'Mirasol' has resurfaced lately, not just as an oil company, but as a symbol of the struggle over resources that fuels the chaos. When we talk about real accountability, this is where it starts. How can there be accountability for bloodshed and public funds when weapons are in the hands of those who answer to no one? I've been following this file for years, and I can say with confidence: the continued existence of multiple armed factions is the sole guarantee that corruption and the plundering of the people's wealth will persist. The whispers behind the scenes these days aren't new; they're an extension of the power struggle between regional and international players exploiting this vacuum.

  • The Sudanese Scene: An open battle between the army and the Rapid Support Forces, with international pressure for a ceasefire, but the bigger question remains over the fate of heavy weaponry after the war.
  • The Libyan Scene: A political divide reflecting a military one, with internal and external factions pulling at the reconciliation file, while the ordinary citizen remains the biggest loser.
  • Egypt and the Weight of Stability: Cairo is moving cautiously, knowing full well that any collapse among its neighbours means the fire will reach its own doorstep. Egypt's role today is pivotal in trying to unite the different parties, but it remains contingent on those parties' seriousness in giving up their own 'Minecraft'.

When 'Minecraft' Becomes a Bitter Reality

Anyone following the details finds that the term 'Minecraft' is no longer just a video game; it has become an accurate description of the situation in the neighbouring countries. Each party tries to build its own world according to its own rules, forgetting that when these virtual worlds collide with reality, they turn into human catastrophes. The tragedy is that some regional players still treat these files like a game of chess, forgetting that the pieces here aren't inanimate objects; they are blood and souls. Every time I read a message from someone in charge of these files, I get the sense they recognise the danger, but hesitate to make the decisive move that would end this suffering.

The inescapable conclusion, agreed upon even by those who differ on the details, is that resolving the region's crises begins with ending the state of multiple military allegiances. What's happening in Sudan and Libya is a harsh lesson for anyone who thinks stability can be built on shifting sand. Talk of elections, development, and the return of migrants – all these are dreams that won't be realised unless the state is the sole entity with the authority to use force. We are at a defining juncture: either the idea of a unified, national state prevails, or we descend into a never-ending spiral of chaos that serves only those who want this region to remain weak and torn apart.